🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives buried in graves at risk from coastal erosion argue that indecision over how to tackle the issue is causing them unnecessary distress concerning the final resting places of their departed family.

A Looming Threat to Historic Churchyards

The council have identified three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being engulfed by the sea in the coming decades.

A recent report on the situation sets out a range of options, from taking no action to exhuming remains and relocating them in safer locations. Officials maintain it is for local people to decide how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It upsets me. They intended this to serve as their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Estimates suggest at least part of one churchyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Past

One resident recalled a school trip to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the water, including its church and graveyard.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get carried away to sea. They won’t. Individuals will take bones as souvenirs and go plundering graves in search of valuables. It’s completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that befell at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Jeopardy

Further up the shoreline lies the grave of a ex-soldier killed while working abroad. His parent said she lost sleep after learning her child's grave might one day be moved.

“It truly trouble me to consider this won’t be his permanent resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an important site to visit.”

In her view, new burials should stop but says it is premature to disturb current plots. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an early decision needs to be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Searching for Solutions and Clarity

The lack of consensus over the timing and method to tackle the problem has left grieving relatives feeling exasperated and worried.

Several families are calling for more coastal protections to slow the inevitable erosion and to allow funerals to proceed for now. Others contend the time for relocation is approaching.

“The situation is very emotional,” said one relative. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A local official confirmed the burial sites were under the care of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is up to them to decide the path to take. Our role is here to assist them through that process with residents.”

He added there was ample time to consider all the choices. “We are talking many years before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should be done yet. We need productive community discussions to find the appropriate answers for each community.”

The possibility of losing the historic sites was labeled one of “immense sorrow for the area,” but faith leaders also spoke of a belief in resurrection, providing a spiritual perspective on the temporal loss of hallowed earth.